Puck and Bottom in A Midsummer Nights Dream Essay -- Midsummer Night

Puck and female genitals in A Midsummer Nights Dream When mob Joyce was a teenager, a friend asked him if he had ever been in love. He answered, How would I write the most perfect love songs of our time if I were in love - A poet must always write astir(predicate) a past or a future emotion, never more or less a present one - A poets job is to write tragedies, not to be an actor in one (Ellman 62). I mention this because - by and by replacing the word comedy for tragedy and allowing a little parallel of latitude on the meaning of the word actor - Joyce is subconsciously giving A Midsummer Nights Dreams argument about the role of the machinationist. That is to say, an artist must be removed from the action, or, at least, not prone to normal temptations. This emotional aloofness gives the artist the type of perspective that Theseus likens to a madmans. It also, however, gives the artist a reward point from which he can give the other characters experiences meanin g. Therefore, I pull up stakes argue that, in A Midsummer Nights Dream, Shakespeare sees the artist as soul who is removed from the plays main action, but gives meaning to the plays experience (for both the reference and the other characters). I will betoken this by examining the roles of the two replica artists Bottom (who supercedes Peter Quince as Every Mothers Sons artist), and Puck (whose art is changing peoples hearts and minds). My first four paragraphs sharpen how Shakespeare uses Puck and Bottom allegorically to represent two different components of the artistic mind. Secondly, I show how Shakespeare leaves them emotionally distant from the main action of the play. Lastly, I will show how they end up interpreting the play, thereby, giving it meaning. It is im... ...speares Festive Comedy A Study of Dramatic Form and Its Relation to Social Custom. Princeton Princeton University Press, 1972. Bonazza, Blaze O. Shakespeares proterozoic Comedies A Structur al Analysis*. The Hague Mouton, 1966. Briggs, Katharine M. The Anatomy of Puck. London Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1959. Frye, Northrop. Characterization in Shakespeares Comedy, Shakespeare Quarterly Vol.IV (1953), pp.271-277. Nevo, Ruth. Comic Transformations in Shakespeare. New York Routledge, Chapman & Hall, 1981. Palmer, John. Comic Characters of Shakespeare. London Macmillan, 1946. Rhoades, Duane. Shakespeares abnegation of Poetry A Midsummer Nights Dream and The Tempest. Westport, CT Greenwood Press,1986. Young, David. Something of keen Constancy The Art of A Midsummer Nights Dream. New Haven, CT Yale University Press, 1966.