Anti-Nepotism and the Loss of Privacy :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Anti-Nepotism and the liberation of PrivacyIntroductionWhen employees bring their personal problems to work and it affects their performance or the performance of others, clearly you can coach, counsel, warn, and ultimately terminate their employment. In cases where employees did non cause a problem at work but were blast merely because of an anti-nepotism policy, courts in some states found the employees had been discriminated against on the basis of married status. Such policies penalize employees who are married, as compared to unmarried employees whose relationships are as intimate. Currently, thirty-eight (38) states prohibit marital status dissimilarity. Having a more(prenominal) oecumenic policy prohibiting employees who co-habit from working in the same area would not reave marital status fair plays, but could be considered an invasion of common law privacy, which is recognized in most states (Risser 1997). In my paper, I will underwrite the issue of anti-nepotism, and invasion of common law privacy. What business is it of the organization if volume co-habit? How are employers supposed to know who is living together? The prohibition against invasion of privacy by the government is enforced, yet anti-nepotism policies seem to supercede even those more strictly. Anti-Nepotism What is Nepotism? Nepotism comes about whenever an employee makes decisions affecting a close relative or national partner. Included in these decisions are those that pertain to hiring, appointment, reappointment, classification, reclassification, evaluation, promotion, transfer, discipline, supervision, or pay increases. correspond to the King County Board of Ethics, nepotism is a conflict of interest ground on familial relationship or domestic partnership, and is inconsistent with the basic principles of ethics (Edwards 1998). The practice of nepotism is said to be inconsistent in instances that require aboveboard decision-making and attempts to ensure that privat e interest or personal benefit does not override the publics interest. In addition, nepotism creates situations that appear of improper diverge or favor. As such, anti-nepotism policies have been written to protect public organizations from contrary lawsuits. There are many discriminatory clauses of anti-nepotism policies, as they pertain to man-to-man lifestyle and privacy.Although an anti-nepotism policy does not expressly discriminate against an applicant based on the condition of being married or unmarried, it may unpack a person because of the particular identity element of his or her spouse. Whether spousal identity as opposed to marital status per se is a prohibited basis for discrimination is an unanswered question under many discrimination laws