Classical Criminology Theory Essay

What is the sheer school of criminology and what are the main points of this surmise. Cesare Beccaria was a key thinker of this theory and is similarly considered by about the founder of modern criminology. Classical school of criminology theory placed emphasis on mankind rationality and dissolve provide. flash off this theory unlike the another(prenominal)s researched the prevention of umbrage not the criminals. Also, according to this theory, iniquity was the result of mint choosing to do so with the possibility of the consequences be evident. The perfect theory of Beccaria and others is what our physical composition was based upon so as you can see, it has cracking significance to our family. world are believed to carry in their suffer beaver interests. We have our own free will and we as well have a rational side to us. This was the basis of the classical criminology theory. Being the case, this theory emphasized laws that would adjudicate non criminal ac tions would be in the best interest of society. Punishment and determent was an of the essence(p) factor in this theory because the penalization had to reinforce bullying so the great unwashed could rationalize the self benefits of criminality from the consequences of criminality. payable to the fact that Beccaria believed that bad laws led to criminality, a lot of his emphasis was based on preventing villainy and swift penalty when detestation was committed. In his eyes penalization is justify and to defend the peace of society and that society would be motivated to have by it. This meant that punishment was to treat the criminal, disenable them from repeating criminal acts and deter would be criminals. To incorporate these ideas Beccaria believed that punishment should be swift, certain, deterrence, comparative to the crime, clear and based on plus and negative reinforcement. Swift punishment is believed to deter the most.According to Beccaria, when punishment prompt ly follows the crime, the punishment will be reinforced in a persons mind before they act criminally. A certain punishment is also a form of deterrence because the less(prenominal) would be criminals think they can pound a guidance with, the to a greater extent they will weigh in the consequences of that action. General deterrence is used for the purpose of setting and mannequin for society. Laws should also be clear I defining crimes. This will prevent judge from interpreting the law and only let in them to decide if the law has been broken. Lastly, the most telling way in preventing crime is to ordinate clear laws that reward good fashion and punish bad behavior.The theory of counterbalance is another relationship between crime and punishment. The belief is that punishment can only deter if the punishment is proportional to the crime. The punishment must coincide with the crime in that the more serious the crime the more serious the punishment. Lastly, punishment exis ted to deter masses from committing crime and the punishment should out way the gains of committing the act. Beccaria was a believer in that crime was due to unjust laws not because of the people committing the acts. fit the crime. He argued that if the punishment was more excessive than the crime it would be an plague of power by the state and it would also create more crime.Beccaria was considered the founder of the classical school of criminology. He emphasized human rationality and free will, preventing crime and deterrence of crime. The classical criminology theory was different from the other theories that were introduced to us because it focused on the reasons why people commit crimes not on the deviant behaviors themselves. Beccaria and his followers had a great impact on our country it is what our constitution and current laws are based upon. meshing Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Cesare Beccaria.http//www.utm.edu/research/iep/b/beccaria.htmKeel, Robert. noetic Choice and D eterrence Theory. http//www.umsl.edu/rkeel/ two hundred/ratchoc.htmlSiegel, Larry. Criminology. Canada Thomas Learning, Inc, 2003.